Excuse Me While I Single-Handedly Dismantle Al-Qaeda

(For those new to my writing:  This is satire.  I do not expect everyone to "get" this.  If you don't enjoy satire, or don't like being challenged, perhaps, regarding our conceptions of "church", please don't bother reading it.  No worries or anything!  -- just trying to save you time.)

 

 

Alan Hirsch, in his book, points out that Al-Qaeda is almost impossible to stop.  This is, in large part, due to the way its message works, and the way the work gets carried out.  And he's absolutely right.

 

So, in the service of national defense, I propose the following, in order to effectively neutralize the movement.  Let's get Al-Qaeda to...

 

1)  Complexify the message

 

Right now, it's so simple, it can pass from one to the next, and be easily grasped by the uneducated, the young -- everyone.  This is dangerous, because it's highly contagious, and people on the street feel capable of enlisting others in the cause. 

 

2)  Construct a less "flat", more hierarchical structure

 

Currently, small, underground groups can move nimbly and autonomously, complicating efforts to thwart them.  A more regimented, stratified approach, where some members are left thinking, "I can't know enough to do anything" would bring the movement to a halt.

 

3)  Foster "expert" culture, and barriers to entry to the expert class

 

Promote the idea that the message is not only highly complex, but only some can truly understand it.  Construct extensive barriers to entry to the presumed expert class.  Promote idea that cells lacking a certified member of expert class, it is not equipped to be activated.

 

4) Focus on knowledge, rather than doing

 

Complexification and expert-class development will make cells spend immense amounts of time studying the work, even debating theories of the work, rather than doing it.  Better yet...

 

5) Equate STUDYING the work with the work itself

 

The cells are called to ACT, of course.  But if we can convince operatives that the work, itself, is in trying to understand the complexity of the work?  They'll be effectively neutered.  We need to get them to spend large amounts of time in study, gathering to study, believing they don't know enough, hiring new experts to teach them again and again, and attending teaching events.

 

They'll actually believe they're doing their work when they attend events held by experts.  This will render the cell, and the whole movement, harmless!  Convince them that the most radicalized, militant among them are merely called to bring other non-activated members to the cell events.

 

6) Sabotage cell multiplication

 

VERY important!  Cells that operate under simple principles, with motivated operatives, devoted to multiplication?  Very, very dangerous, fast-growing, and pop-culture endangering.  We must stop this in its tracks, and this is done in multiple ways: 

 

A)  Foster egos and small-time celebrity.  By convincing operatives to set up individual fiefdoms, fewer autonomous cells will be activated.  Rather, the emphasis will be on building larger individual cells with numerous unactivated members.

 

B)  Make the basic structure highly difficult to replicate.  Al-Qaeda cells currently are, by necessity, simply-structured and easily replicated.  Propagate idea that for cells to begin, planning, experts and capital must be simultaneously accumulated.  Expert motivational speakers will be necessary, plus paid staff with highly specific training and talents.  Operatives will see massively "successful" large cells, and attempt to duplicate them, with very limited success because of the huge inputs required.  This will greatly inhibit growth.

 

C)  Convince philosophically-aligned, but non-active, members to choose from among most entertaining, high quality, cells that offer services for them. Not only will this engender a harmless, internal focus, it will require IMMENSE amounts of resources and energy.

 

7) Make operatives really, really busy. 

 

Replace simple, animating mission with lengthy lists, charts, and programs for cell maintanance.  Convince them that this institutional maintenance is, actually, the mission, itself.

 

This will leave them will no actual time for conducting actual mission.

 

8)  Get Al-Qaeda to seek governmental approval. 

 

Offer tax incentives if necessary.  The larger cells, requiring large edifices, will also require tremendous amounts of capital.  This will also allow a measure of control, to threaten the cell's tax status, thereby threatening funds for internal programs, when necessary.

 

Better:  They'll consider actual operational cells that exist without this governmental approval to be, themselves, invalid!

 

9)  Co-opt Al-Qaeda with the larger culture. 

 

Once members are convinced that cell maintenance and study are actually their "mission", the rest of their lives can be harmlessly integrated with the culture at large.  They'll be indistinguishable from non-members, and, because of their new understanding of "mission", effectively equivalent to non-members.

 

10)  Convince members to wear Al-Qaeda t-shirts with funny sayings and stuff.

 

Mission accomplished. 

 

It'll work to thwart an evil message.  It even works with the good ones.

posted by Brant Hansen at 2:59 PM on April 22nd, 2010
16 Comments   |   Email this to a friend   |  







Please enter the anti-spam code from the image above.
this actually sort of reminds me of the screwtape letters in a way because it's like the "reverse learning" that lewis made use of in the book, except in this case you take things that are present within christianity and suppose at what would happen if those traits were put into a bad organization. nicely done sir, nicely done
Posted By Stone | April 22, 2010 @ 8:31
Touche, sir. Touche. Satire sure is interesting!
Posted By Patrick | April 22, 2010 @ 8:35
Sounds like Al Queda read the book of Acts..

-- Mike
Posted By Mike T. | April 22, 2010 @ 8:41
This is both funny and really true. Even with all the holes and loose stitches in Islam, it sure is simple so any man can know they just need to own a gun and join a cell. This is a great piece of satire.
Posted By Matt | April 22, 2010 @ 9:30
I think it will work... OMGAWD.. you should be in congress.. lol.. Love you guys..
Posted By Dhana Hicks | April 22, 2010 @ 9:53
This was a satire version of conviction. ^.^ At least I got to laugh while I got convicted. Well done, Brant.
Posted By Aelfay | April 22, 2010 @ 10:55
Yep, that oughta work. You should prepare for your Nobel Peace Prize!
Posted By Cynthia | April 22, 2010 @ 3:02
Definitely a must read at many churches these days. Funny, yet sadly so true....
Posted By Tom | April 23, 2010 @ 6:25
WOW! We cripple ourselves in so many areas...the enemy is thriving in defeating the effective spread of the Gospel, the ONLY hope of VICTORY!
Posted By Vicki | April 23, 2010 @ 6:40
Not only do I "get" your satire, but I agree. But how do we fix a system that is so very broken? My heart aches for the mondern day Church. My heart aches for my friends and family who love God with their whole hearts, yet exist in an odd system scarcely resembling the Biblical Church. And I'm right there with them. Wrapped up in the programs and the busyness--and calling it "ministry."

Thanks for saying it so well.
Blessings,
Sandy
Posted By Sandy Cooper | April 23, 2010 @ 6:46
Unbelievably funny, and sad at the same time...Mission accomplished...we are heading to something BIG...
Posted By Lianne | April 23, 2010 @ 7:11
Wow. Well written, Brant. You have effectively, satirically, put into words the "realignment" that the modern church needs! Lord, help us to become so single-minded on spreading the Gospel, that everything else pales in comparison!
Posted By S****** | April 23, 2010 @ 7:31
Great work man----My personal favorite is
#4) Focus on knowledge, rather than doing------
WE GOTTA ACTUALLY DO THE WORK IF WE ARE GOING TO ACTuALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE..not just meet, talk, study and then meet again about it...JUST DO IT-

Most "Ministry" has gotten too big and too busy to be really effective. I think we are "going through the motions" in a lot of cases with very little attention being paid to what "fruit" we are accomplishing. This current system of spreading the Good News of our Savior often lacks real heart,--the love and grace we are so freely given should be the EXACT IMAGE we are sending out---not this seemingly over-complicated yet watered-downed version we are dispensing that is at best slightly effective and at worst, soon to be ignored and irrelevant.

ITS SIMPLE CHURCH!---Share the Good News of Our Savior....Walk in Love toward EVERYONE...and MIRROR GOD's GRACE that he shows US EVERYDAY...

I know its much easier said than done but THE CHURCH needs TO LIVE IT, NOT JUST TALK ABOUT IT. (and I count myself in with THE CHURCH)




PS---Great comparison to Lewis's Screwtape Letters---It did remind me of that also
Posted By CG | April 25, 2010 @ 12:45
Good call, Brant. I was like "oh, this is a great idea" at first, and then towards the middle I was like "Oh, this is like our churches" and by the end I thought "WOW, how do Christians accomplish ANYTHING?!?" Thanks for the call to action!
Posted By Tricia | April 25, 2010 @ 4:38
Dude! That was awesome. Definatley makes you think... Good work, Brant!
Posted By Mary Elizabeth | April 30, 2010 @ 6:07
You know... On the work itself, I love it!! The satire drives home the point perfectly.

The title "hilarious" refers to how people are reading the piece. Some are convicted and see church as conformant, others are reading and see church as emergent, and still others are reading and think you're serious. I find it amusing (and quite scary at the same time) that people are actually grabbing ahold of this and are convicted to move forward. In my opinion, this was a satirical piece on how NOT to move forward with the message. I'm not sure how anyone can read Step 9 and say this is a good idea...

This IS the message of the "emergent church" and yet there's a whole lot of people walking out of the doors Sunday morning that are (interchanging "members" with "believers") "indistinguishable from non-believers and..., effectively equivalent to non-believers."

That's downright scary.
Posted By Cory D. Jones | May 3, 2010 @ 2:17
(Sponsored link)